People have lived in the land that is now Papua New Guinea for more than 40,000 years. Highland communities developed farming systems thousands of years ago, while coastal and island societies built wide exchange networks and maintained connections across the seas. Hundreds of languages and distinct cultural traditions reflect this long and varied history. European contact increased from the sixteenth century onward. Germany administered the northern part of the territory, while Britain and later Australia administered the south. After the First World War, Australia took control of the former German territory under an international mandate and later administered the territory under a United Nations trusteeship. Japanese forces occupied parts of New Guinea during the Second World War, and the fighting left lasting effects on communities, infrastructure and memory. Papua New Guinea became independent on 16 September 1975. The post-independence period includes the development of national institutions, tensions between central government and local communities, and the Bougainville conflict from 1988 to 1998. Oral testimony and customary knowledge are especially significant because many historical experiences were not recorded in written sources. Researchers compare these accounts with archaeological evidence, colonial records, photographs, maps and environmental evidence, while recognizing that sources can reflect different perspectives and political interests.
History in Papua New Guinea
The history of Papua New Guinea spans more than 40,000 years of human settlement, diverse societies, colonial rule and independence since 1975. Archaeology, oral histories, languages, material culture and written records together show how communities changed over time. Colonial borders and administration affected political institutions, land relations and economic development, while local communities retained distinct identities and systems of knowledge.
Tip
Use a specific place, period and question when studying Papua New Guinea's history; a country-wide account can hide major regional differences. Compare oral testimony and customary knowledge with archaeological, written and visual sources, and record which perspective and limits each source represents.

